Penerapan Dakwaan Oleh Penuntut Umum Kejaksaan Negeri Padang Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online  Di Kota Padang

Andre; Diana Arma; Nilma Suryani

doi:10.25077/delicti.v.1.i.1.p.50-59.2023

Authors

Andre Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas
Diana Arma Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas
Nilma Suryani Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/delicti.v.1.i.1.p.50-59.2023

Keywords:

Online Gambling Crime, Indictment, Public Prosecutor

Abstract

There are online gambling cases where the Public Prosecutor tends to charge with alternative charges using Article 303 of the Criminal Code while the court facts and evidence explain clearly about online gambling. It is interesting to study the implementation of charges by the Public Prosecutor against perpetrators of online gambling crimes in Padang City and the reasons why the Public Prosecutor charges online gambling cases with Article 303 of the Criminal Code, whereas Article 27 paragraph 2 of the ITE Law also specifically regulates online gambling. This paper uses empirical juridical research methods, where the data used is primary data and secondary data through literature study. The application of charges in online gambling cases by the Public Prosecutor needs to pay attention to several things, the most important of which is to complete the elements relating to Article 27 paragraph 2 of Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning ITE. In many online gambling cases that go to the Padang District Prosecutor's Office, there are deficiencies in evidence to complete the elements in the ITE so that the gambling articles in the Criminal Code are used

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachtiar. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Umpam Press, 2018.

Kartono, Kartini. Patologi Sosial 2 : Kenakalan Remaja. Rajawali Pers, 2013.

Zainuddin Ali. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Soerjono Soekanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 1981.

Falah, Muhammad Fajrul, Fanny Tanuwijaya, and Samuel SM Samosir. “Perjudian Online: Kajian Pidana Atas Putusan Nomor 1033/PID.B/2014/PN.BDG.” E-Journal Lentera Hukum 4, no. 1 (2017). doi:10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4493.

Franky Satrio Darmawan. “Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis Terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Tindak Pidana Perjudian Togel Secara Online Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 599/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Jkt Utr.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanegara, 2021.

Gubuino, Septiana Erike, and Sri Suwartiningsih. “PRAKTIK PERJUDIAN (Studi Kasus ‘Judi Kupon Togel’ Di Kecamatan Tobelo, Kabupaten Halmahera Utara, Provinsi Maluku Utara).” KRITIS 24, no. 2 (2017). doi:10.24246/kritis.v24i2p177-197.

Purba, Iin Hotprinauli, Jhosua Marganda Rumapea, Ferdinan Jodi M Sinaga, and Joshua Hartman Naibaho. “UPAYA DALAM MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN TOGEL DI MASYARAKAT.” Jurnal Darma Agung 30, no. 2 (2022). doi:10.46930/ojsuda.v30i2.1586.

Riki Afrizal, Iwan Kurniawan, Tenofrimer. “REHABILITASIMEDIS TERHADAP TERDAKWA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA DALAM PERSPEKTIF DAKWAAN DAN TUNTUTAN PENUNTUT UMUM.” Unes Journal Of Swara Justisia 7, no. 2 (2023): 808. doi:https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.382.

Vivi Arfiani Siregar, Vivi Arfiani Siregar. “ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN RENCANA TUNTUTAN (RENTUT) DI INTERNAL KEJAKSAAN INDONESIA.” JURNAL HUKUM DAS SOLLEN 4, no. 2 (2020). doi:10.32520/das-sollen.v4i2.1414.

“No Titl,” n.d. https://harianhaluan.id/peristiwa/hh-18732/polresta-padang-ungkap-24-kasus-judi-32-orang-ditetapkan-tersangka/.