Sanksi Publisitas Dalam Bentuk Pidana Pengumuman Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Korporasi Pelaku Perdagangan Orang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25077/delicti.v.2.i.1.p.51-66.2024Keywords:
Publicity Sanction, Adjudication Announcement Penal, Corporate CrimeAbstract
Indonesia ratified the Law Number 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Trafficking in Persons (UUPTPPO) which contains comprehensive regulations that expand the scope of perpetrators by including corporations. Fine penalty only has a financial impact and is considered as business loss for corporations. In addition, the additional penalties provided for by the law do not have much impact on corporations as they can still operate without a license. The trend of corporations to seek maximum profit, coupled with the lack of knowledge of victims about the modes of human trafficking crimes, makes it necessary to impose additional penalties such as the announcement of the court's decision. This study aims to explain the urgency of the announcement of the court's decision as an additional penalty and to provide ideas for its implementation scheme. The research results show that the announcement of the court's decision is a formal publicity sanction that has never been applied in Indonesia. As input to fill the legal vacuum, limited formal publicity sanction mechanisms can be used as a reference for implementation. Through such a mechanism, the announcement of the court's decision is aimed at lowering the reputation and inducing government intervention.
Downloads
References
Buku
Amrullah, M. Arief. Politik Hukum Pidana dalam Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Ekonomi di Bidang Perbankan. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.
____Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Perspektif Kejahatan Teroganisasi. Malang: Surya Pena Gemilang, 2014.
Dominick, Joseph R. “Children’s Viewing of Crime Shows and Attitudes on Law Enforcement.” Journalism Quarterly, 1974.
Fisse, Brent dan John Braithwaite. The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders. New York: State University of New York Press, 1984.
Hutchinson, Terry. Doctrinal Research: Researching the Jury. Oxford: Routledge, 2013.
Hutter, Bridget M. dan Clive J. Jones. “From Government to Governance: External Influences on Business Risk Management.” Regulation and Governance, 2007.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). Panduan Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Jakarta: International Organization for Migration, 2021.
Kadish, Sanford H. Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice. New York: The Free Press, 1983.
Kraft, Michael E., Mark Stephan, dan Troy D. Abel. Coming Clean Information Disclosure and Environmental Performance. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011.
Laws, U.S. National Commission on Reform of Federal Criminal. “Study Draft I.” Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1970.
McFarlane, Bruce. Economic Policy in Australia. Australia: Investigator Books, 1968.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2013.
Reksodiputro, Mardjono. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana : Kumpulan Karangan Buku Keempat. Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum UI, 2007.
Rourker, Francis E. Secrecy and Publicity: Dilemmas of Democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1961.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers, 2007.
Wulandari, Nindya. “Pidana Tambahan Pengumuman Putusan Hakim di Indonesia dan Prancis.” LEIP: Lembanga Kajian & Advokasi Independensi Peradilan, 2016.
Jurnal
Cartwright, Peter. “Publicity, punishment and protection: The role(s) of adverse publicity in consumer policy.” Legal Studies 32, no. 2 (2012): 179–201.
Erp, Judith G Van. “Naming Without Shaming: the Publication of Sanctions in the Dutch Financial Market.” Regulation and Governance 5, no. 3 (2011).
Erp, Judith van. “Reputational Sanctions in Private and Public Regulation.” Erasmus Law Review 1, no. 5 (2008): 145–62.
Fisse, Brent. “The Use of Publicity As a Criminal Sanction Against Business Corporations.” Melbourne University Law Review 8 (1971).
French, Peter A., Van E. Langley, san Manuel Velasquez. “The Hester Prynne Sanction.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 4, no. 2 (1985).
Galbiati, Roberto, dan Nuno M. Garoupa. “Keeping Stigma Out of Administrative Law: An Explanation of Consistent Beliefs.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007.
James Garofalo. “Crime and the Mass Media: A Selective Review of Research.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 18, no. 2 (1981).
Katz, Elihu. “The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 21, no. 2 (1957).
Manuel Velasquez French, Peter A., Van E. Langley, “The Hester Prynne Sanction,” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 4, no. 2 (1985): 25
United Nations. United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime and Protocol The Protocols Thereto (2004).
Website/internet
Agus, Del. “Kerja sampai Mati: Siksaan terhadap ABK Indonesia di Kapal Tuna Tiongkok.” Mongabay, 2022. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2021/10/21/kerja-sampai-mati-siksaan-terhadap-abk-indonesia-di-kapal-tuna-tiongkok/.
Wahidin, Kudus Purnomo. “Perdagangan orang dalam angka.” Diakses 21 September 2022. https://www.alinea.id/infografis/perdagangan-orang-dalam-angka-b2cDK98f6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ivanna Eltiara Cahyani, Arief Amrullah, Dina Tsalits Wildana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas